health Immune

Can You Have Too Much Protein?

Can You Have Too Much Protein?

Can You have too much protein

A diet too high protein diet is bad for your health. The U.S. National Library of Medicine recommends that you eat no more than 35 grams of protein a day. However, eating a higher amount of protein is still okay. It can actually improve your health. A high-protein diet can result in kidney stones, colon cancer, and heart disease. In addition, it can lead to gastrointestinal problems and heartburn.

If you’re concerned that too much protein is unhealthy, you should remember that the human body can only absorb a certain amount of protein. If you take a protein supplement or shake, you should probably limit them to a reasonable number (source). While it’s important to consume enough protein to maintain a healthy body, it’s also important to know your individual protein needs. Try to determine a range that fits within your protein requirements. In general, a good range is between 0.5g and 1g per kilogram of body weight. As you can see, there are many sources of this substance, and it’s important to be aware of them before you make a decision.

Research suggests that eating more than 1.5 grams of protein per pound of body weight is not beneficial to your health. For example, you should limit your intake of meat to one-half a small boneless chicken breast. If you’re a sedentary person, you can safely eat up to five grams per pound per day. For most people, though, this is still considered a small amount, and should not be exceeded by a meal.

Although a large amount of protein is beneficial, it is possible to have too much. Depending on your weight, a healthy person can only consume about thirty grams of protein a day. For example, eating a half-boneless chicken breast and two eggs contains about 50 grams of protein per meal. A person can have too much protein without any adverse effects. A high-protein diet is beneficial for people with a high risk of developing heart disease.

The daily protein intake recommendations for healthy people are different. For example, a woman of 150 pounds should consume about five grams of protein a day. She should be careful not to exceed that amount, since consuming too much can cause problems for her kidneys and liver. A large amount of protein can lead to dehydration, kidney failure, and other chronic ailments. You should avoid eating red meat and processed food, and opt for lean meats and eggs.

While many people may be unaware of the benefits of consuming too much protein, it is important to understand how much is too much. The human body can only use a certain amount of protein, and it can be harmful to your health. A 30 gram serving of chicken breast is about three times as large as a cup of cottage cheese and two eggs. So, if you are a vegetarian, you should increase your protein intake by increasing the amount of lean meat and fish.

While there is no definitive evidence that too much protein causes health problems, there are some warning signs. Excessive protein can cause gastrointestinal issues, and may increase your risk for cancer and heart disease. Additionally, it can lead to a loss of appetite and kidney damage. Therefore, a diet rich in protein should be balanced and contain a wide variety of foods. This is not the only way to eat a healthy diet.

In general, a person can consume a certain amount of protein daily. A healthy adult needs to consume about 40 to 50 grams of protein daily, but can you have too much? If you’re an active person, you should aim for this number. For instance, if you’re a vegetarian, you shouldn’t eat more than two hundred grams of meat a day. For a 150-pound woman, the recommended daily amount of protein is about five and a half grams. If you’re a sedentary person, you shouldn’t consume more than fifty grams of dairy products, two eggs, and one cup of cottage cheese.…

Read More
Default Immune

Bioavailability and Ubiquinol: A 70% Better Solution Kaneka Ubiquinol is a sponsor.


The importance of Ubiquinol, the active antioxidant form of coenzyme Q10, in energy production and heart health was described in our earlier blog, “Ubiquinol and Your Heart: The Cellular Story.” Given its importance, it is crucial to comprehend its bioavailability and pharmacokinetics in order to ensure proper clinical use.

As you may be aware, coenzyme Q10 in its purest form is not readily absorbed by the human body. However, studies show that Ubiquinol has a higher absorption rate and can refill normal CoQ10 plasma levels. The bioavailability of Ubiquinol and coenzyme Q10 were evaluated in a randomised, double-blind, crossover trial employing an acute intake of 100 mg in 10 healthy volunteers with 2 weeks between treatments. At 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after ingestion, plasma concentrations of Ubiquinol were considerably higher than coenzyme Q10 (P0.001), and the AUC for Ubiquinol was 4.3-fold higher than coenzyme Q10. 1

This higher bioavailability was also seen for long-term consumption. After four weeks of supplementation, the absorption of Ubiquinol and coenzyme Q10 (200 mg/d) in 12 healthy participants was examined in a crossover, comparative research. In a direct comparison, ubiquinol was absorbed twice as well as ubiquinone (P0.005). When final plasma concentrations were compared, Ubiquinol was absorbed 1.7 times better than CoQ10 (4.3 g/ml vs. 2.5 g/mL), or 70% better. 2 Because Ubiquinol’s decreased nature favours micelle formation, a key stage in absorption in the small intestine, enhanced micellarization in the gut could be one explanation. 3

The quantity of absorption varies depending on a person’s age and health, but Ubiquinol has consistently been considerably better absorbed than coenzyme Q10 and refills plasma concentration in every published comparison trial.


Transportability in the blood to the sites of application, in addition to bioavailability, is an important element in efficacy. Ubiquinol is delivered in the bloodstream by binding to lipid particles known as low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL cholesterol). When coenzyme Q10 is consumed, the body swiftly converts it to Ubiquinol through an enzymatic mechanism, making it the most favoured form for blood transport. 6 Because some people struggle to make the shift, they get minimal benefit from taking coenzyme Q10 instead of Ubiquinol (stay tuned for a future blog on this issue!). In a healthy adult, however, the Ubiquinol form of coenzyme Q10 accounts for more than 95% of total coenzyme Q10 in the blood. 9-11 Ubiquinol is a reduced form of CoQ10 that makes up a large majority of CoQ10 in tissues. 10

Because CoQ10 has a Tmax of 6.5 hours and an elimination half-life of 33.19 hours, it can be taken once a day. Chronic treatment results in a dose-dependent rise in plasma total cholesterol. Coenzyme Q10 is a type of coenzyme that is found in…

Read More

Kaneka sponsored a webinar on How Genetics Can Affect the Body’s Use of CoenzymeQ10 and Ubiquinol.


A comprehensive assessment of a person’s health provides us with the information we need to make therapy suggestions. The influence of genetics, on the other hand, is one of the less visible aspects of the overall picture. SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) have been shown to alter a person’s ability to use dietary supplements. Is it possible that this factor is at play when taking coenzyme Q10?

The answer is yes, as it turns out. NQ01 is an SNP that affects the ability of the body to convert coenzyme Q10 to Ubiquinol. Let’s look at what happens there in more detail.

If you read our previous post, “Ubiquinol and Bioavailability: A 70% Better Solution,” you’ll recall that Ubiquinol is the preferred form of coenzyme Q10 in the blood, as well as the form in which it is best transported to the cell, where it plays a critical role in the production of energy from food. When you eat coenzyme Q10, your body immediately converts it to Ubiquinol.1

By adding two electrons and two hydrogens to coenzyme Q10, it becomes Ubiquinol. Coenzyme Q10 reductase, a particular enzyme that enables the two-electron reduction, is required for this transition to occur (both for coenzyme Q10 and other substrates). In young, healthy people, about 95 percent of the coenzyme Q10 in circulation is in its reduced form (ubiquinol). 2,3 If coenzyme Q10 reductase is made incorrectly, the transition may take longer to complete. As a result of the lower antioxidant activity, people with the NQO1 SNP are more vulnerable to oxidative stress and have a higher tendency to disease.

We can now analyse the blueprints for many genes thanks to the sequencing of the human genome. In a specific gene, we can see the distinct, typical variances between persons. SNPs can also be found in genes that code for enzymes, such as our target enzyme, coenzyme Q10 reductase. These SNPs can cause slight, or occasionally large, alterations in the enzyme’s action. NQ01 is the name of the gene that codes for coenzyme Q10 reductase. A SNP in the NQ01 gene causes a version of coenzyme Q10 reductase to be less efficient than other versions, because the SNP causes this version to be broken down much faster in the body than other versions. 4

As a result, people with this SNP have less coenzyme Q10 reductase around, which compromises the conversion of coenzyme Q10 to Ubiquinol. As a result, these people’s bodies will have a difficult time carrying coenzyme Q10 to the cells that require it, and taking coenzyme Q10 as a supplement will provide little benefit.

The frequency of the NQ01 polymorphism in the population varies by ethnicity: it is found in the homozygous form (both genes) at a frequency of 4% in Caucasians, 5% in African–Americans, 16% in Mexican Hispanics, and 22% in Chinese populations in the homozygous condition (both genes).5

Taking Ubiquinol provides the body with the desired and active form right away, avoiding the SNP issue entirely by obviating the necessity for the coenzyme Q10 reductase enzyme. Because Ubiquinol is a lipid-soluble antioxidant, this not only improves efficacy in the mitochondria, but also boosts oxidative potential.

Testing for an SNP in the NQ01 gene is not yet standard practise, but it will hopefully become so in the future. It’s a good idea to start with Ubiquinol, especially if coenzyme Q10 hasn’t worked in the past.…

Read More

An Update on Elderberry’s Antiviral Activity


European elder (Sambucus nigra), also known as black elder and elderberry, is thought to be beneficial for the prevention and treatment of influenza and upper respiratory infections, though researchers are still debating which stage of infection it is most effective in and what the exact mechanisms of action are that lend elderberry its anti-viral effects. Sambucus canadensis (American elder) is a fast-growing, deciduous North American shrub with blooms and berries similar to Sambucus nigra. Elder flower extracts are also used to treat colds and flu. Only European elder berries will be discussed in this review.

Torabian et al1 studied the mechanism of action of elderberry and its principal anthocyanin component, cyanidin 3-glucoside, on influenza virus infectivity in an in vitro study published in the Journal of Functional Foods. Pasteurized whole-elderberry extract, as well as the isolated bioactive component cyanidin 3-glucoside, were tested at various doses in the study. The effect of these extracts at various doses on influenza virus activity at various stages of infection was the primary outcome investigated.

Elderberry had an inhibitory effect at all stages of influenza infection, but it was significantly stronger in the late stage than in the early stage; smaller concentrations (higher dilutions) of elderberry had partial or no inhibitory effect in the early phase, but those same concentrations had a significant inhibitory effect in the late phase. Furthermore, elderberry’s antiviral effectiveness against influenza was highest when it was administered before, during, and after infection, rather than just during infection. Elderberry’s antiviral efficacy on influenza is confirmed by a number of methods of action, including reducing virus entrance into cells, modifying the post-infectious phase, and limiting viral transmission to other cells, according to the study. Elderberry also increases the production of IL-6, IL-8, and TNF, suggesting that it has an indirect effect on the body’s viral immunological response. Elderberry, but not its main bioactive ingredient, cyanidin 3-glucoside, was found to have this effect.

Although no human clinical trials on elderberry for influenza prevention have been published, black elderberry extract has previously been found to inhibit human influenza A (H1N1) infection in vitro by binding to H1N1 virions and limiting the viruses’ capacity to infect host cells.

2 Elderberry was found to be effective against 10 strains of influenza virus in the same investigation, and its efficacy was compared favourably to the anti-influenza actions of oseltamivir (Tamiflu) and amantadine.

Torabian et al. released their mechanistic investigation, which was detailed above, almost simultaneously with the first meta-analysis of four randomised controlled trials on the effects of elderberry supplementation on acute upper respiratory symptoms.

3 Three studies (Zakay-Rones 1995,4 2004;5 Tiralongo 20166) looked at the entire length of time that upper respiratory symptoms lasted. Another study, Kong 20097, assessed symptoms across six symptom scales during the course of a 48-hour intervention. In the meta-analysis, 89 people in the elderberry group and 91 people in the control group took part (total 180). Three trials looked at the effects of elderberry treatment on confirmed instances of influenza or patients with symptoms that were consistent with an influenza infection. The effects of elderberry on symptoms associated with the common cold were investigated in the other trial.

Elderberry had a big effect size (ES) of 1.717 (P0.001), indicating that it significantly reduced the duration of upper respiratory symptoms. The efficacy of elderberry supplementation on upper respiratory symptoms was not affected by flu vaccination status, which was controlled for. Although the effect on cold symptoms is still within the criterion for a medium effect, elderberry appears to diminish symptoms caused by influenza virus (ES: 2.074) significantly more effectively than upper respiratory symptoms caused by the common cold (ES: 0.662).

Although the Tiralongo experiment on elderberry’s effect on common cold symptoms in air travellers failed to attain statistical significance, the amount of 90—135 mg of anthocyanins per day was significantly lower than that utilised in the Zackay-Rones studies (1,900 mg daily).

8 Kong utilised a 175 mg extract four times a day for two days in his study. This illustrates the large range of elderberry extracts available commercially.

These findings provide an alternative to using antibiotics to treat upper respiratory symptoms caused by viral infections, as well as a possible safer option to prescription medications for common colds and influenza. Elderberry appears to be most beneficial when administered before and throughout infection, albeit in the early stages of infection, a larger dose may be necessary to achieve considerable anti-viral activity.

*A word on safety: elderberries contain cyanogenic glycosides (such as sambunigrin), which are degraded in the gastrointestinal system to hydrogen cyanide.

9 Poisoning and hospitalisation have occurred in the United States after consuming undercooked elderberry products. 10 Smaller doses of these glycosides do not usually require hospitalisation, although they can cause nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea in some people, especially youngsters. 11…

Read More